‘Feminist Judgments: Reece v Elliott

“… In today’s case, Reece v Elliott (Tenn Ct App 2006), Dean Browne C Lewis (below right) provides the commentary on which sets up her alternative opinion, in which she is joined by Elizabeth V Sparks. Bonnie and Eugene Reece signed an antenuptial agreement in which they agreed that their pre-marital property would be treated as separate. Both had children from previous marriages from prior marriages for whom they wanted to provide. After Eugene died, Bonnie sued to declare the agreement invalid because, she claimed, although Eugene had disclosed that he owned Routh Packing stock, he had not disclosed the value of the stock …” (more)

[Jeremy Telman, ContractsProf Blog, 23 July]

(Visited 11 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply