Mark McBride, ‘The Unavoidability of Evaluation for Interest Theories of Rights’

EXTRACT
In debates over rights, as much as, or perhaps more than, in any philosophical debate, it is important to see the wood from the trees. A little while ago, new life was breathed into debates over rights, as a new candidate theory emerged to rival the extant options. More specifically, Gopal Sreenivasan’s hybrid theory of (claim-) rights emerged to rival both will theory and interest theory. This new hybrid theory underwent a series of skirmishes with the interest theory. Moving from the wood, one principal ground over which battle ensued is the so-called third party beneficiary issue. And, more specifically still, descending into the trees, a particular problem within the foregoing third party beneficiary debate centred on what I shall dub Gopal’s Granny, a case wielded by Gopal Sreenivasan, particularly against one of the foremost defenders of the interest theory, Matthew Kramer.

Mark McBride, The Unavoidability of Evaluation for Interest Theories of Rights, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2020.11. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2020.

Leave a Reply