“The Supreme Court has held that a clause in a contract, which required modifications to that contract to be in writing and signed by the parties, invalidated a subsequent oral agreement to vary the contract. However, the Supreme Court declined to rule on the second issue raised: whether the proposed variation had valid consideration and thus fulfilled one of the requirements to create a binding contract in English law …” (more)
[Mitchell Abbott, UK Supreme Court Blog, 18 May]
First posted 2018-05-18 17:49:46
Leave a Reply