Custers, Dechesne, Sears, Tani and van der Hof, ‘A Comparison of Data Protection Legislation and Policies Across the EU’

Although the protection of personal data is harmonized within the EU by Directive 95/46/EC and will be further harmonized by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in 2018, there are significant differences in the ways in which EU member states implemented the protection of privacy and personal data in national laws, policies, and practices. This paper presents the main findings of a research project that compares the protection of privacy and personal data in eight EU member states: France, Germany, the UK, Ireland, Romania, Italy, Sweden, and the Netherlands. The comparison focuses on five major themes: awareness and trust, government policies for personal data protection, the applicable laws and regulations, implementation of those laws and regulations, and supervision and enforcement.

The comparison of privacy and data protection regimes across the EU shows some remarkable findings, revealing which countries are front runners and which countries are lagging behind on specific aspects. For instance, the roles of and interplay between governments, civil rights organizations, and data protections authorities vary from country to country. Furthermore, with regard to privacy and data protection there are differences in the intensity and scope of political debates, information campaigns, media attention, and public debate. New concepts like privacy impact assessments, privacy by design, data breach notifications and big data are on the agenda in some but not all countries. Significant differences exist in (the levels of) enforcement by the different data protection authorities, due to different legal competencies, available budgets and personnel, policies, and cultural factors.

Custers, Bart and Dechesne, Francien and Sears, Alan M and Tani, Tommaso and van der Hof, Simone, A Comparison of Data Protection Legislation and Policies Across the EU (December 20, 2017), Computer Law and Security Review, doi 10.1016/j.clsr.2017.09.001.

(Visited 6 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply