David Salmons, ‘Claims Against Third-Party Recipients Of Trust Property’

Abstract:
This article argues that claims to recover trust property from third parties arise in response to a trustee’s duty to preserve identifiable property, and that unjust enrichment is incompatible with such claims. First, unjust enrichment can only assist with the recovery of abstract wealth and so it does not assist in the recovery of specific property. Second, it is difficult to identify a convincing justification for introducing unjust enrichment. Third, it will work to the detriment of innocent recipients. The article goes on to show how Re Diplock supports this analysis, by demonstrating that no duty of preservation had been breached and that a proprietary claim should not have been available in that case. The simple conclusion is that claims to recover specific property and claims for unjust enrichment should be seen as mutually exclusive.

David Salmons, Claims Against Third-Party Recipients Of Trust Property, Cambridge Law Journal, Volume 76, Issue 2, July 2017, 399-429.

(Visited 13 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply