ABSTRACT
This article considers how a mens rea regime growing out of principles of corrective or restorative justice, taken by many theorists to underly tort law, differs from the kind of mens rea regimes which arise in a system of criminal law grounded in more traditional retributivist, expressivist, or deterrence-based principles. Recent scholarly proposals to import restorative and corrective justice approaches to criminal law are often motivated by the view that, by eschewing punitive punishments, such approaches are less harmful toward defendants. This article argues, in contrast, that a more traditional ‘offender-centric’ criminal law focused on the degree of blameworthiness of the defendant actually affords less culpable defendants more protection than would a victim-centric criminal law, modeled after tort law and grounded in principles of corrective or restorative justice.
Antill, Gregory, Rights, Reasons, and Culpability in Tort Law and Criminal Law (May 21, 2024), Columbia Public Law Research Paper Forthcoming; in Rights in Criminal Law (Philipp-Alexander Hirsch and Elias Moser eds) (forthcoming 2025).
Leave a Reply