Category Archives: Taxonomy

Timothy Kaye, ‘A Sound Taxonomy of Remedies’

ABSTRACT Judges and practitioners need recognized categorizations to act as the premises from which reasoned arguments may be developed. The lack of a meaningful taxonomy of remedies is, therefore, a significant impediment to reasoned legal argument. This paper outlines what such a taxonomy should look like. Replicative remedies exist to vindicate primary rights. We call […]

Christopher Bruner, ‘What Is the Domain of Corporate Law?’

ABSTRACT … The article first explores the general challenges faced in any project of legal taxonomy, focusing on the inherent tension between internal and external views of law and the dynamic relationship between legal doctrine and social context. Through that lens, the analysis turns to extant modes of defining corporate law as a field – […]

Stephen Thomson, ‘Judicial Review and Public Law: Challenging the Preconceptions of a Troubled Taxonomy’

Abstract Much has been written on whether public/private distinctions should be made by judicial review. Little explored is the related but distinct question of whether judicial review should itself be classed as a branch of public law. This important issue of taxonomy affects the limits, contours and methodology of review, yet is often taken for […]

Paul Craig, ‘Taxonomy and Public Law: A Response’

Abstract There are, unsurprisingly, various ways in which to organize the material that comprises public law broadly conceived. The criteria that are brought to bear vary considerably, as does the purpose of the enterprise. The consequences of the organizational endeavour can differ significantly, ranging from the semantic to the substantive. Jason Varuhas has proposed a […]

Jason Varuhas, ‘Taxonomy and Public Law’

Abstract: This paper (i) identifies the reasons for the general absence of legal taxonomy in public law scholarship; (ii) argues that legal taxonomy and taxonomic debate is vital to the principled development of public law and rigorous legal analysis, and is of acute importance today given trends towards open-ended balancing in public law adjudication which […]

Gianclaudio Malgieri, ‘Property and (Intellectual) Ownership of Consumers’ Information: A New Taxonomy for Personal Data’

Abstract: This article proposes a new personal data taxonomy in order to determine more clearly ownership and control rights on different kinds of information related to consumers. In an information society, personal data is no longer a mere expression of personality but a strong economic element in the relationships between companies and customers. As a […]

Sheehan and Arvind, ‘Private law theory and taxonomy: reframing the debate’

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to reframe the taxonomy debate which has, in recent years, come to dominate private law theory. We argue that the debate to date has been flawed by two fundamental mistakes. First, little attention has been paid to how legal taxonomies are actually used. This, we argue, is regrettable: […]

Hanoch Dagan, ‘Doctrinal Categories, Legal Realism, and the Rule of Law’

Abstract: Properly understood, legal realism stands for the conception of law as a going institution (or set of institutions) distinguished by the difficult accommodation of three constitutive yet irresolvable tensions: between power and reason, science and craft, and tradition and progress. Realists argue that the availability of multiple, potentially applicable doctrinal sources renders pure doctrinalism […]

Michael Lobban, ‘Mapping the Common Law: Some Lessons from History’

Abstract: This paper explores the ways in which jurists from the 17th to the 19th centuries attempted to map the law. There were multiple ways of mapping the law and its concepts. No single taxonomy was comprehensive. The most general maps were found in treatises, organised largely around the rights of person and property. However, […]

Gerald Postema, ‘Law’s System: The Necessity of System in Common Law’

Abstract: TE Holland infamously described the common law “chaos with a full index” and critics from Jeremy Bentham to Peter Birks have criticised common law for its manifest absence of system. Defenders of contemporary common law celebrate its alleged resolute anti-theoretical stance and resistance to systematisation. However, this characterisation of common law, shared by defenders […]